Unified Intelligence Network for Crypto Investigations
Free platform for law enforcement to deconflict overlapping cryptocurrency
investigations across agencies—preventing duplicate work, accelerating cases,
and recovering assets faster.
Trusted by 800+ Law Enforcement Agencies Worldwide
From federal agencies to major city departments, Deconflict coordinates to prevent overlapping investigations, saving time and resources.














“Every investigator I speak with recognizes the need for this tool, it’s indispensable in the field.”
“I use it daily for cross-checking investigations. It’s my go-to for every crypto case.”
Built by Federal Agents for Law Enforcement
Operates a global case‑deconfliction network that alerts agencies to overlapping investigations and delivers law‑enforcement intelligence to regulated institutions, without sharing investigative files.
Secure Intelligence Sharing Network
Wallet Overlap Detection
Automatically identifies when multiple agencies are working the same wallets or subjects, so teams can coordinate instead of colliding and avoid duplicative subpoenas.
Privacy-First Design
Agencies share only essential identifiers such as wallet addresses and limited metadata. Full case narratives, suspect identities, victim information, and operational plans never leave the originating agency.
Agency Coordination Alerts
Delivers automated alerts when investigations overlap on the same on‑chain entities, while keeping all investigative files, tactics, and operations fully siloed from other participants.
Network Participation
Verified law enforcement and regulated financial institutions share only essential identifiers, like wallet addresses and risk indicators, while retaining full control of case files, investigations, and internal systems.
Intelligence Aggregation
Platform aggregates essential case identifiers from participating agencies into unified risk intelligence, accessible to all network members without exposing sensitive investigative details.
Operational Independence
Platform enhances coordination without replacing existing investigative workflows. Agencies retain full autonomy over case management and investigative decisions.
Multi-Agency Coordination Gaps
Case Coordination Challenges
Overlapping Investigations
Law enforcement agencies routinely open investigations targeting identical subjects with no mechanism to identify conflicts.
Duplicated Investigative Effort
Agencies conduct redundant blockchain analysis, duplicate evidence collection efforts, and repeat investigative steps already completed by other jurisdictions.
No Coordination Infrastructure
Traditional intelligence sharing requires full case disclosure to achieve coordination. Most agencies cannot share case details across jurisdictions, preventing effective deconfliction.
Financial Institution Compliance Challenges
Pattern-Based Detection Limitations
Transaction monitoring systems flag cryptocurrency activity based on algorithmic patterns, not confirmed fraud. High false positive rates overwhelm compliance teams and lack evidentiary support for account actions.
Examiner Documentation Standards
Examiners require documented rationale for suspicious activity reports and account closures. Pattern-based tools cannot provide investigative context needed to defend compliance decisions.
No External Investigative Context
Financial institutions cannot access investigative intelligence from law enforcement agencies. Blockchain analysis tools provide transaction patterns but no information on which addresses are tied to active investigations.
Crypto Exchange and Stablecoin Issuer Challenges
Pre-Deposit Screening
Cryptocurrency exchanges need real-time fraud intelligence to block malicious deposits before funds enter their systems. Traditional tools identify fraud patterns after transactions occur too late to prevent deposits.
Regulatory Expectations
Regulators demand proactive illicit activity detection with auditable documentation. Exchanges must demonstrate reasonable measures to prevent illicit activity—blockchain heuristics alone insufficient for regulatory defense.
No Agency Investigative Access
Blockchain analytics identify suspicious patterns. They cannot identify which specific addresses are subjects of active law enforcement investigations without access to case data.
Core Platform Features
Real-Time Case Deconfliction
Automated conflict detection when agencies submit cryptocurrency addresses tied to investigations. System alerts affected agencies to overlaps without exposing case files.
Law Enforcement Intelligence
Fraud detection trained on confirmed case data from participating agencies, not blockchain pattern analysis.
Wallet Analysis Tools
Wallet analysis, counterparty identification, and transaction pattern reports supporting investigations and prosecutions.
API Integration
Programmatic intelligence delivery integrates with existing case management systems, compliance platforms, and transaction monitoring infrastructure.
Network Intelligence
Each agency submission strengthens collective investigative capability. Individual wallet reports create network-wide threat visibility unavailable from isolated agency analysis.
Secure Network Infrastructure
All communications and data storage conducted through encrypted channels. Platform meets law enforcement information security requirements for sensitive but unclassified systems.